Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: "Dave Moore" <valveless@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 03:20:57 -0600
Cool, thanks.
--DM--
"Bret Cannon" <bnroest_csapnanmon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:rEYSf.9924$bu.2309@xxxxxxxxxxx
: I have recently been working with the Burr-Brown (now Texas Instruments)
: OPA656 and OPA657 and both have flat open loop frequency response to beyond
: 100 kHz. Have fun testing them by ear.
:
: Bret Cannon
:
:
: "Dave Moore" <valveless@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: news:JkPSf.253$4Q.137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: >
: > "John Popelish" <jpopelish@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
: > news:5e6dnX2G1oIGRofZ4p2dnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > : Dave Moore wrote:
: > : (snip)
: > : > In the past I've plunked a variety of op-amps into pre-designed
: > : > circuits and though analysis of those designs didn't reveal anything
: > : > to me that could account for the obvious difference in tone
: > : > (other than some near-instability issues), I hope do a better
: > : > study and compare the op-amps in circuits that are more
: > : > individually optimized. Perhaps Kevin is right and it's all been
: > : > done before, but regardless, I like to prove things for myself.
: > :
: > : You are missing my point.
: > :
: > : I'll start over.
: > :
: > : Tube amplifiers tend to be made with as few tubes as possible, for
: > : obvious reasons of cost, size and complexity. This usually means that
: > : each stage up to the final output is a single tube, with minimal
: > : feedback around it. When such stages are over driven, as the output
: > : voltage approaches the highest and lowest possible values, the stage
: > : gain drops off smoothly and cleanly and the output slides in to a
: > : nearly steady value, and waits for the signal to reverse directions.
: > : And then the gain rises smoothly and the voltage takes off cleanly in
: > : the other direction. Saturation of the output is a graceful and
: > : simple process, as is recovery from saturation.
: > :
: > : Opamps are completely different. They are complicated systems of up
: > : to dozens of devices that all work together as long as inputs stay
: > : inside the input common mode range, and the output is not saturated
: > : fully positive or negative, or asked to change voltage faster than it
: > : is able (exceed the slew rate limit). Under these conditions, an
: > : opamp is a programmable device, It performs an almost unlimited
: > : number of functions that are very strictly controlled by the input and
: > : feedback networks connected around them.
: > :
: > : However, if the input common mode specs are violated, or the output is
: > : allowed to saturate (because the input and feedback networks in
: > : conjunction with the input signal asked it to), or to a lesser extent,
: > : if the output is asked to change voltage faster than it is able, the
: > : internal circuits go to hell. And when the input signal and external
: > : network, once again, puts the inputs back inside the common mode
: > : range, or asks the output to come out of saturation, or slows the
: > : request for output voltage change to within the slew rate limit,
: > : There is a period of time (sometimes surprisingly long) that the opamp
: > : struggles to regain normal operation, and can do all kinds of
: > : unpleasantly sounding things.
: > :
: > : So, while it is perfectly good to have single active device stages be
: > : slapped with overdrive, and use them to obtain a pleasing sound
: > : coloration, this is not the way to do such coloration with opamps.
: > : All the "effects" have to be built into the input and feedback
: > : networks, so that the opamp is externally programmed to produce the
: > : colored overdrive sound without it actually ever being over driven,
: > : itself. If this is done correctly, there is a range of effects
: > : limited only by your imagination and time to experiment, that, if the
: > : opamp stays in its normal operating conditions every microsecond, it
: > : will have almost nothing to do with the sound quality. It will just
: > : be following its program.
: >
: > Ideally, yes, However, the only place I've ever seen an ideal opamp
: > is in some of my CAD programs.
: >
: > : If you change opamps, the limits that it
: > : can tolerate, and still be an opamp every microsecond, change, and
: > : allow you different freedom as far as the program (external network)
: > : goes but it still won't produce ant "sound" that is separate from the
: > : program.
: >
: > :
: > : So I don't approach a sound effect task by surveying opamps for their
: > : sound, I design the input and feedback networks that produce the
: > : programming I want to hear, and then figure out what opamp specs are
: > : needed to be able to execute that program. Or I build the networks
: > : and check with test equipment that the opamp is able to keep up with it.
: > :
: > : This is how engineers "see" opamps in a circuit, and why you are
: > : receiving so much static from them, here, when you say you want to
: > : listen to some opamps to hear what they sound like. An opamp you can
: > : hear is an opamp that is not being an opamp all the time. Some of the
: > : time, it is a failure.
: >
: > First off, you haven't told me a thing yet that I don't already know.
: > Secondly, I never intentionally program opamps to fail at being
: > an opamp for the sake of any sound coloration or effects simply
: > because to do so IMO would be a problem if you ever wanted
: > to go commercial with a design and that particular opamp were
: > discontinued. So, in essence what I want from an opamp is
: > as little coloration as possible and leave the coloration to
: > components that will be available for future support.
: > :
: > : Now, if you have a particular programming network in mind and a signal
: > : you want to pass through it, that you want to listen to, we can help
: > : you figure out what opamp specs are required to carry out that program.
: >
: > I can pretty much do that myself. I've got opamp application notes and
: > network theory articles up the whazoo. Up until now, all I've done is
: > take note of the networks and which opamps sound different in them.
: > Soon I plan to sit down and pour over the specs of the opamps and
: > determine if there are some specs that are being violated. However,
: > there doesn't seem to be anything that really stands out about
: > some of these networks that could intuitively account for an opamps
: > inability to track well. Some are very basic networks and the
: > signals are small. However, perhaps after I review the specs,
: > something may stand out.like a sore thumb. And also, as I mentioned
: > before, perhaps a comparison of reasonably spec'd opamps in
: > within networks designed to complement them will reveal absolutely
: > no difference in sound or tone, dunno. I do know however that
: > the ear is remarkably sensitive to various distortions that are
: > virtually undetectable with a scope. I do hope to eventually
: > acquire some more sophisticated means of measuring distortion
: >
: > However, the main limitation I encounter in guitar amp design is
: > in the coupling caps. I always seem to get better sound out of high
: > speed opamps operated at lower impedances, but this tends to
: > dictate larger coupling cap values. Since I've never gotten any
: > results with coupling caps that I like asd much as the results I get
: > with oil/paper caps, generally I'm forced to operate at high enough
: > impedance values to keep the oil/paper caps down to reasonable
: > values and physical sizes.
: > I've had good results coupling through large value electrolytics
: > or other large value "crap-acitors" such as mylars and using
: > some negative feedback to linearize them.
: > Also had good results coupling through what I call a "crap-acitor
: > parasitic nulling divider" which entails sending the signal through
: > a resistor on top of a cap on top of a cap on top of another resistor
: > to ground with the resistors being equal in value as well as the
: > "crap_acitirs" You of course take the signal out at the center
: > of this nulling divider which is the node where the two caps
: > connect. Abd of course you also have to suffer some signal
: > loss. I have even combined the two aforementioned
: > methods. These methods do indeed reduce the coloration of
: > the coupling caps. However, oil/paper caps seem to impart
: > a very special coloration that most ( actually all so far) of the
: > guitarists I deal with like very much.
: >
: > I'm aware of opamp theory and I understand why some engineers
: > think there's no reason to "sonically evaluate" opamps. However,
: > I have my reasons for doing so and if anyone thinks me a fool for
: > doing so, so be it. They ain't got'ta be so arrogant and snobbish
: > about it however.
: >
: > Dave Moore
: > ( Just a fool that gets results)
: >
: >
:
:
.
- References:
- op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: John Popelish
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: John Popelish
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: John Popelish
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: John Popelish
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Dave Moore
- Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- From: Bret Cannon
- op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- Prev by Date: Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- Next by Date: Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- Previous by thread: Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- Next by thread: Re: op-amps with wide open-loop bandwidth ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading