Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:15:39 -0500
On 27 Mar 2006 20:39:55 -0800, the renowned "David L. Jones"
<altzone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your choice, and that's fine. I'd rather halve my development time than
save a few bytes of RAM.
Compiled code is usually a bit *better* at RAM usage because the
compiler very agressively overlays automatic variables in functions.
Of course that doesn't help you with statics and globals.
OTOH, examples that show C being similar to assembly in code memory
usage and performance are usually contrived or do things that C does
rather well (eg. a TCP/IP stack).
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: Keith
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- References:
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: Keith
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: Keith
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: Keith
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: Keith
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: Microcontroller Project
- Prev by Date: Re: PLL as modulator og demodulator
- Next by Date: Re: awesome
- Previous by thread: Re: Microcontroller Project
- Next by thread: Re: Microcontroller Project
- Index(es):