Re: feynman video and photons
- From: "Ancient_Hacker" <grg2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Apr 2006 14:06:20 -0700
Jamie Morken wrote:
I think a photon is really only a definition of magnitude,
not an actual particle.
Problem with that-- put a candle one foot from a square meter sized
photocell. The photocell has a bazillion little particles of some
photosensitive metal, say calcium, in ultra-fine powdered form. Each
calcium particle is isolated form all the rest.
Let's say you get 10^18 electrons per second out of the photocell.
Now put a x10 filter between the two. So far so good, you now count
10^17 electrons per second. But then harbor-freight-physics has a
sale, and you buy 16 more x10 filters. You put them between the candle
and the photocell.
Now you're getting around one electron per second out of the photocell.
For a Nobel prize, please explain how an electromagnetic wave, spread
out evenly over a square meter, can cause one electron to jump out.
For a second prize, explain why the electron sometimes jumps out after
1/10th of a second, when the electromagnetic wave hasnt delivered a
full second's worth of energy,
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: feynman video and photons
- From: Bill Beaty
- Re: feynman video and photons
- From: martin griffith
- Re: feynman video and photons
- References:
- feynman video and photons
- From: Jamie Morken
- feynman video and photons
- Prev by Date: Re: Resistors in a conditioning circuit
- Next by Date: Re: OT: What the hell ever happened to Iraq and Afghanistan? More fucked up kids
- Previous by thread: Re: feynman video and photons
- Next by thread: Re: feynman video and photons
- Index(es):