Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:05:28 +0100
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:01:29 GMT, Rich Webb
<bbew.ar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:56:48 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
manusha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
hi,As long as the words "HP" or "Agilent" do not appear ANYWHERE on the
im planning to buy an Oscilloscope for my personel work.
im wondering whether to buy a PC based one or stand akone unit.
any advice on this pls..
thank you
CMOS
oscilloscope, you should be just fine.
Heh. That's one of the rules of thumb that doesn't seem to have changed
very much. ;-)
Yep. When I ran the analog group at Genrad/OmniComp (portable tester
products) Phoenix, I forbid the use of hp 'scopes, and also Motorola
LM324's ;-)
...Jim Thompson
What was the deal with their LM324s ?
I have to say I never got a Motoraola bifet to work without oscillating btw.
Their early ones were shocking. MC34001 ? etc...
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- References:
- Oscilloscope info
- From: manusha
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Rich Webb
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Jim Thompson
- Oscilloscope info
- Prev by Date: Re: WEEE and CdS cells
- Next by Date: Re: another strange idea
- Previous by thread: Re: Oscilloscope info
- Next by thread: Re: Oscilloscope info
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
