Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:08:36 -0700
John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:41:00 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>Wasn't tht the one with an impossible to reach fuse in it?
wrote:
Rich Webb wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:56:48 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
manusha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
hi,
im planning to buy an Oscilloscope for my personel work.
im wondering whether to buy a PC based one or stand akone unit.
any advice on this pls..
thank you
CMOS
As long as the words "HP" or "Agilent" do not appear ANYWHERE on the oscilloscope, you should be just fine.
Heh. That's one of the rules of thumb that doesn't seem to have changed
very much. ;-)
There is one exception: The 130C was an outstanding oscilloscope.
It, of course, has been steadily downhill since.
The 185 sampling scope was stunning. Heavy and ugly, but stunning.
Dual-trace, 5 GHz bandwidth, about 10 ps RMS jitter, using *tubes* in
about 1962.
John
The one where they build the oscilloscope by laying the fuse on the production line and assembling everything else around it?
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@xxxxxxxxxx
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
.
- References:
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Oscilloscope info
- Prev by Date: Re: Oscilloscope info
- Next by Date: Re: (OT) well there you have it...
- Previous by thread: Re: Oscilloscope info
- Next by thread: Re: Oscilloscope info
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
