Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- From: dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 1 May 2006 11:57:27 -0700
Joerg wrote:
<snip>
What would be the minimums in resolution and
color/gray scale retainment required for a "paperless office"? Minimums
as to agency requirements, IRS and others. Several times I tried to find
official guidelines but there wasn't much. It would be nice if at least
some stuff could go electronic.
Regards, Joerg
I've got about half my articles digitized.
For monochrome 1-bit images, I've found 300 dots-per-inch is
fine--as good as an excellent fax--*except* you'll lose the occasional
subscript, superscript, or fine-print. Those items become too
pixellated to read at that resolution. 600 dpi binary images are
great, tiny details are clear.
100dpi 8-bit grayscale is surprisingly readable, and is what I've
stored some older magazine articles with photos in, but that's max'd
out: 'zooming' in reveals no further detail. It's much nicer to use
200+ dpi in grayscale, and then be able to zoom in and see details
clearly when things aren't so clear.
Optical character recognition (OCR): many programs work MUCH better
with 600dpi 1-bit images (e.g. Pagis Pro), though my ancient version of
PaperPort likes 300dpi fine, and recognizes more accurately than its
(former) competitor with 4x the pixels.
HTH,
James Arthur
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- From: Kryten
- Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- From: Joerg
- Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- References:
- Scanning electronic magazines
- From: Kryten
- Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- From: Joerg
- Scanning electronic magazines
- Prev by Date: Re: (OT) well there you have it...
- Next by Date: Re: (OT) well there you have it...
- Previous by thread: Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- Next by thread: Re: Scanning electronic magazines
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|