Re: (OT) well there you have it...

On Wed, 03 May 2006 10:11:31 -0700, Mark L. Fergerson wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:
"Mark L. Fergerson" <mfergerson1@xxxxxxx> wrote in message

If I'm disgruntled about anything, it's suckers like you who take to
heart the Liberal bull*** presumption that any criticism of the
behavior of a particular group of people is "racism" without daring to
question that presumption.

Groupism?

Dead-on. "If ye ain't fer us, yer agin us".

It used to be called "sterotyping" or "pigeonholing"; one would
hear/read a statement that conflicted with some dearly-held meme/dogma,
identifying the speaker/writer with "the enemy", prompting one to label
the speaker/writer with the Evil Label Of The Day. In this way I see
modern politics as more resembling a State Religion than actual politics.

Bloggs knee-jerk accused me of a "KKK affiliation", Rich Grise
similarly called me a Neocon because I violated both of their dogmas.

Huh? When did I call you a Neocon? If you're the Mark L. Ferguson I'm
thinking of, you're almost the opposite - you're one of the voices of
reason around here.

If it looked like I had called you a neocon, it was very likely a
misquoting. I don't think I've ever seen you parroting the Dubya dogma,
which is what pushes my "he's a neocon" button.

So, if I did, I apologize, and whether I was drunk or high is irrelevant
- there's no excuse for that kind of negligence, and it won't happen again.

Thanks,
Rich

.

Quantcast