Re: LED eye damage
- From: "redbelly" <redbelly98@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 May 2006 06:24:59 -0700
Tim Williams wrote:
"mc" <look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:K_9cg.41566$QU3.18163@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The risk of damage to any particular area of the retina depends on the
wattage per area, not the total wattage.
So why don't we have billions of atom-sized pinholes in our retinas from
looking at the night sky full of neutron stars and pulsars? ;-)
<G,d&r>
The diffraction limit of our eyes puts a lower limit on how small an
image can be. And it's a lot larger than an atom :-)
Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: mc
- Re: LED eye damage
- References:
- LED eye damage
- From: Dirk Bruere
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: colin
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: Dirk Bruere
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: mc
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: mc
- Re: LED eye damage
- From: Tim Williams
- LED eye damage
- Prev by Date: thanks + how to detect a persistent signal anomaly
- Next by Date: Re: OT: OpenOffice not 100% compatible?
- Previous by thread: Re: LED eye damage
- Next by thread: Re: LED eye damage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|