Re: Death by Communism

In article <T29cg.55048$iB2.13241@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
There is no evidence that second hand smoke is particularly dangerous.

Foolish statement.

No, fact.

Where did you look for this evidence before concluding there wasn't any?

There simple isn't any. Because you can smell it, doesn't mean
it'll kill you.

I gather you have carefully reviewed dozens if not hundreds of high-profile
medical research projects? What are your qualifications to perform this
review? Bibliography, please.

Please show me where second-hand smoke is a killer no matter how
good the ventilation is. If you believe this crap, why don't you
simply not enter such a dangerous place? You _do_ have that
choice, just like you have the choice of not being offended.

--
Keith
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Death by Communism
    ... Where did you look for this evidence before concluding there wasn't any? ... Because you can smell it, ... it'll kill you. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: AAT is based on comparative data (Re: Algis ranting about AAH
    ... Another words, he has out-of-date savanna beliefs, but he is up to date ... > Evidence they butchered animals, ... > littoral-lifestyle anywhere in the history of Homo, not now, not ever. ... We don't need good smell. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Review system: whats the point?
    ... the only way the TV umpire can ... >> angles concluding consistently. ... >> evidence, and then determining enough-ness of evidence. ... of 100 people would also infer, like you/Rauf/whoever, that the ball ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Review system: whats the point?
    ... the only way the TV umpire can ... angles concluding consistently. ... evidence, and then determining enough-ness of evidence. ... of 100 people would also infer, like you/Rauf/whoever, that the ball ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
  • Re: Review system: whats the point?
    ... >>> reject the null hypothesis is if there is enough conclusive evidence ... >>> angles concluding consistently. ... The only thing the third umpire need concern ... back to the on-field umpire what he sees"...did Asad Rauf actually see ...
    (rec.sport.cricket)
Quantcast