Re: randomized white noise = white noise?

Assuming you meant for b1 to have white/4, not tw/4, that doesn't do
too bad, and is a good illustration of being clever with coefficients.
The ripples in the error are not quite as well behaved, but the
peak-to-peak error is actually less than with the original
coefficients. If I match up to zero error at 1kHz, then 20Hz is
-0.907dB, peak at 31Hz of -0.552dB, valley at 111Hz of -1.420dB, peak
at 4196Hz of +1.156dB, valley at 18872Hz of -1.837dB.

But we still don't know what's good enough for the application...

Cheers,
Tom

.