Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- From: mzenier@xxxxxxxxxx (Mark Zenier)
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 18:21:06 GMT
In article <e5cujc$hak$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian <brian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When you consider lead usage was NEVER AN ISSUE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, the
arguement just becomes stupid. Rene, Spehro, Nico, try arguing that lead in
electronics was a hazard to begin with. Tell me where this was ever found to
be true, where this data is, what it was based on. You HAVE TO ANSWER THESE
FIRST, because otherwise, why the HECK would it make any sense to change in
the first place???
Two words: Garbage Incinerators.
Mark Zenier mzenier@xxxxxxxxxx
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- From: Brian
- Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- References:
- RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- From: Brian
- RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Where to buy big plastic anchors for concrete?
- Next by Date: Re: Pitch distortion in VoIP?
- Previous by thread: Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- Next by thread: Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|