Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:00:37 GMT
Hello John,
We did a couple hundred big ugly 25-slot CAMAC crates with AMPReminds me of the "pressfit" days. A rep came and said that this new
solder-less pressfit method would guarantee 99.95% good contacts. Our
motherboard had about 6000 contacts. So when he did his spiel in front
of the big brass I raised my hand and asked him: "That would mean that
three contacts are statistically open. Can you tell me which ones that
would be?" After that you could have heard a pin drop in that meeting room.
I'd nearly forgotten about compliant pin technology. Insertion forces seemed
scary.
pressfit card-edge connectors, and I can't recall having any problems.
Can't say that from what I've seen. Once I had a hard time convincing a client to solder their motherboards again. Luckily an incident happened that did it: Pulled a large board with three DIN connectors in back. It did what dentists might call an "involuntary extraction": One of the motherboard DIN counterparts came out with it. The client went back to soldering and most MB field failures after rough transport flights and so on went away.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
.
- References:
- Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Nico Coesel
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Joerg
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- From: John Larkin
- Swatch kills RoHS
- Prev by Date: Re: Do you think NI can fix my PLL? -- Details
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for a pulse switch? Does such a thing exist?
- Previous by thread: Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- Next by thread: Re: Swatch kills RoHS
- Index(es):