Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 04 Jun 2006 23:14:23 GMT
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:03:21 +0100, Pooh Bear
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
I've always been happy with Motorola phones, but I need to get a new
one to meet the requirements of E-911.
E-911 ?
Graham
I think it's mandated here in the colonies, by 2007 all cell phones
must be traceable by location for emergency (9-1-1) calls, so new
phones have GPS chips in them.
How much of a "must" is this ..?
Integrity implications..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- References:
- RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Joerg
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why do electric powered automobiles need to be so complicated?
- Next by Date: Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
- Previous by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Next by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|