Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:08:26 -0400
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:33:24 -0700, the renowned Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 04 Jun 2006 23:14:23 GMT,
pbdelete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:03:21 +0100, Pooh Bear
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
I've always been happy with Motorola phones, but I need to get a new
one to meet the requirements of E-911.
E-911 ?
Graham
I think it's mandated here in the colonies, by 2007 all cell phones
must be traceable by location for emergency (9-1-1) calls, so new
phones have GPS chips in them.
How much of a "must" is this ..?
Integrity implications..
I don't know the degree of "must", but apparently there have been a
significant number of applications for waivers...
http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced/
Personally I think it's a good safety feature, but I'm sure that some
will have all kinds of heartburn about privacy issues.
...Jim Thompson
Why would any honest man have any problem with the phone company,
government etc. knowing their location 24/7? I can also order this
information over the net without warrant or other such legitimate
reason..
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: YD
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Frank Bemelman
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- References:
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Joerg
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Prev by Date: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Next by Date: Re: Really lowprofile ethernetjack?
- Previous by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Next by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|