Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Wes Stewart <n7ws*@*yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:04:45 -0700
On Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:29:09 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
"N" dropped her Motorola StarTAC into a footbath at her pedicure place
;-)
Jeezus, it's a small world. My wife did -exactly- the same thing with
-exactly- the same (model) phone.
Immediately turned it off, opened it up to dry, but 48 hours later it
didn't work.
Wife's did after blowing the water out and a little bake in the
kitchen oven.
So she got a new phone.
A few weeks later I decide to scavenge the battery pack from it before
I tossed it. But, out of curiosity, I turned it on first... came
right up ;-)
I've always been happy with Motorola phones, but I need to get a new
one to meet the requirements of E-911.
Why do you want the government knowing where you are at all times?
Can you get a cell phone anymore that DOESN'T have a camera ?:-)
Dunno. Personally, I was quite satisfied with my analog Motorola
Flip-phone. Voices sounded like real human beings.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Joerg
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- References:
- RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Joerg
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Prev by Date: Re: More Best Practices for Engineers
- Next by Date: Re: More Best Practices for Engineers
- Previous by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Next by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|