Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!

In article <4483B4BA.8A53A100@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
krw wrote:

In article <44836988.4584AA57@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
krw wrote:

Oh, my! How politically incorrect. I love it! Is California next
on the embargo?

The road to hell is paved with political correctness. I have never
been "politically correct" in my life. I tell people what I think. On
the other hand, if you want to skip down that path you can be my guest.

I think you misunderstand me incorrectly! ...though it's hard to
figure how.

--
Keith


I'm not arguing, just stating my position on the PC crap. :)

Sorry, it was I who misunderstood incorrectly.

--
Keith
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Worlds Fish Are In Hot Water
    ... >...its context. ... Uh, no. "Political correctness" would suggest, nay, DEMAND, that the ... word itself is "incorrect," such as would require the changing of photo ... If only common sense were a lot more common... ...
    (rec.outdoors.fishing.fly)
  • Re: Job announcement (fwd)
    ... Is it still a joke when the premise is incorrect? ... Ah what the hell... ... > What the eitch ee double toothpicks happened to this newsgroup? ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: should i install windows xp service pack 2
    ... always leaned towards incorrect. ... Really, Carey, er I mean Kelly? ... whatever the hell your name is! ... Kurt Kirsch ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: RoHS AKA Woah, Hoss!
    ... How politically incorrect. ... on the embargo? ... The road to hell is paved with political correctness. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: should i install windows xp service pack 2
    ... always leaned towards incorrect. ... Really, Carey, er I mean Kelly? ... whatever the hell your name is! ... Kurt Kirsch ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)