Re: 4Q Motor control paradox


"John Fields" <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bvqb82lehtsn18vdov9535h5b52sa7rgha@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:39:11 GMT, "Genome"
<mrspamizgood@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


<bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149618216.143130.130260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Genome wrote:
"Tim Wescott" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gc2dnQIGJfPAKhjZnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Genome wrote:

"Roger" <irwin@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149608409.515928.281430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Consider a 4Q motor control with a H bridge driver.


[snip wordy bollocks]

Were you bored with your day to the extent that you had to make that
up.

The energy goes back into the supply, if the supply can't deal with
it
it
goes 'bang'.

DNA
Succinct, accurate, profane -- how could this answer be better?

--

Tim Wescott

The energy goes back into the supply, if the supply can't deal with it,
it
is fucked.

There you go. Does the extra comma help?

Helps me. Spehro is right, even if he was being every so slightly
perfectionist.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen


I think Speff (if I may be so bold) was commenting on the lack of a
profanity.

However, what I should have said was....

The energy is returned to the supply. If the supply is unable to cope with
the returned energy then the supply will be cunted.

---
I think what Speff (If I may be so familiar) might have been
referring to was the missing question mark at the end of:

"Were you bored with your day to the extent that you had to make
that up."


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

I supose you won't believe me if I suggested the omission was deliberate.

DNA


.

Quantcast