Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- From: "Dan Lenski" <dlenski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jun 2006 09:03:20 -0700
dalai lamah wrote:
Because as far as I know, it should be the easiest way (and one of the few
ways) to get true High-Speed USB performances.
Good to know. I was under the mistaken impression that the PICs could
actually do high-speed USB.
PIC18F2450 is USB 2.0 *compatible*, it isn't a High-Speed device. Like FTDI
chips and almost every CPUs/MPUs with integrated USB, it supports USB
Full-Speed (12 Mbps), and I can tell you that in most case you will be
lucky if you can reach 4-5 Mbps.
The thing I don't understand is that the clock rates of the PIC and the
8051 core of the EZ-USB are similar... the PIC runs at 12 MIPS while
the CY7C68013A is 48 MHz (roughly ~20 MIPS I think?). I guess the USB
hardware core of the Cypress must be more efficient?
Anyway, good to know the advantages of EZ-USB. I'm still puzzled about
why anyone would actually want the firmware to be in RAM though...
Dan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- From: dalai lamah
- Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- From: Donald
- Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- References:
- Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- From: Dan Lenski
- Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- From: dalai lamah
- Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- Prev by Date: Re: Best place on usenet to ask about PCs
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting movie
- Previous by thread: Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- Next by thread: Re: Why would anyone choose EZ-USB?
- Index(es):