Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: "Frithiof Andreas Jensen" <frithiof.jensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:36:01 +0200
<langwadt@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149798428.627827.281820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
not
I believe they "only" want to store sender and receiver information
the actual content. But thats scary enough.
Very. Think "All IP network" - the sender/receiver information is in
every package and must be there regardless of encryption so the
legislation neatly sidesteps a nasty technical issue.
Apart from that, the really interesting information about you is in
the network of people you communicate with; f.ex. how many links are
incoming to you, how many outgoing and call frequencies on each
decides your spot in the hierachy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- References:
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Joerg
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Pooh Bear
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: pbdelete
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Wes Stewart
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: mc
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: David
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- From: langwadt
- Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Prev by Date: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Next by Date: GDS to GERBER convertor
- Previous by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Next by thread: Re: RoHS => tin whiskers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|