Re: Low noise amplification



On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:00:28 +0100, in sci.electronics.design Pooh
Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


John Larkin wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:42:57 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Note that, if your signal source impedance isn't optimal for the first
opamp, you might be better off filtering first, using a bandpass
filter with different impedances at opposite ends. This will give a
free, noiseless voltage gain ahead of the first gain stage and also
zap noise that could clip the amp.

That would of course be a passive LC filter.

I'm glad someone made that point !

Graham

digital passive or analogue passive?


martin
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Low noise amplification
    ... opamp, you might be better off filtering first, using a bandpass ... filter with different impedances at opposite ends. ... noiseless voltage gain ahead of the first gain stage and also ... That would of course be a passive LC filter. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Low noise amplification
    ... opamp, you might be better off filtering first, using a bandpass ... filter with different impedances at opposite ends. ... noiseless voltage gain ahead of the first gain stage and also ... That would of course be a passive LC filter. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Low noise amplification
    ... opamp, you might be better off filtering first, using a bandpass ... noiseless voltage gain ahead of the first gain stage and also ... That would of course be a passive LC filter. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: View Question
    ... I know that my join is opposite. ... It is also a LEFT OUTER JOIN which gives me ... with the filter I should have left over the ... > be the opposite of your join, very easy to overlook it though. ...
    (microsoft.public.fox.programmer.exchange)
  • Re: View Question
    ... IN VFP6, and perhaps VFP7, IS NULL and IS NOT NULL didn't work but ... >> then they won't meet the condition of the filter. ... >> be the opposite of your join, very easy to overlook it though. ...
    (microsoft.public.fox.programmer.exchange)