Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:40:46 +0100
John Larkin wrote:
Wow, are you guys still going at it? I've got to admire your boredom
thresholds.
It's impressive in its own perverse way isn't it ?
Graham
.
- References:
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: Brian
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- Prev by Date: Re: Amusing problem about DC polarity
- Next by Date: Re: Board or card?
- Previous by thread: Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- Next by thread: Re: TO-220 Failures due to lead bending?
- Index(es):
