Re: Top posting
- From: "mc" <look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:54:42 -0400
"nospam" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l1jo82d9rkgtvb6fi5c2jnmmtljko0r8ea@xxxxxxxxxx
John - KD5YI <groups5munge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I came to this group to learn. Most of you were here first and you
established whatever rules you deemed appropriate, so I felt it was
appropriate for me to honor those rules. I find that it is no trouble
whatsoever to comply with the group's wishes to bottom post. All I needed
to
know are the rules.
They are not rules they are common sense, an attempt to make this half
duplex medium with huge (and variable) propagation delays more
conversational.
As (I presume) a radio Ham would you prefer to take part is a sequence of
10 minute broadcasts or try to hold a conversation?
The former is actually how voice transmission was done by hams 50 years ago,
when it was relatively hard to switch from transmitting to receiving!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top posting
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Top posting
- References:
- Top posting
- From: Chris Carlen
- Re: Top posting
- From: Didi
- Re: Top posting
- From: mc
- Re: Top posting
- From: Didi
- Re: Top posting
- From: Paul E. Schoen
- Re: Top posting
- From: John Fields
- Re: Top posting
- From: John - KD5YI
- Re: Top posting
- From: nospam
- Top posting
- Prev by Date: Re: Who owns the telephone poles?
- Next by Date: Re: Top posting
- Previous by thread: Re: Top posting
- Next by thread: Re: Top posting
- Index(es):