Re: Stolen designs
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:01:03 +0000 (UTC)
In article <448c76b7$0$492$cc7c7865@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<pbdelete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
status, and they assure me it's good and that they are still
soliciting new customers for it. The depletion-load NMOS MC6800 was in
production for over 20 years! Meanwhile, Intel has introduced and
dumped 10 or 20 generations of embedded products, cancelling some just
after samples were available. They just dumped the Xscale stuff, their
version of Arm (or Mips? I forget.)
Would an conclusion that Intel is an unreliable partner for embedded projects
be true based on this info..?
At least we can say that there was a point at which they did not care
about maintaining a reputation in the embedded market.
What their opinion on the subject today is, I don't know. It doesn't
matter to me because a direct lie they told me some years back got them on
my bad side and on such things I have a very long memory.
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stolen designs
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Stolen designs
- From: John Fields
- Re: Stolen designs
- From: pbdelete
- Re: Stolen designs
- References:
- Stolen designs
- From: Brian
- Re: Stolen designs
- From: EE123
- Re: Stolen designs
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Stolen designs
- From: pbdelete
- Stolen designs
- Prev by Date: Re: Stolen designs
- Next by Date: Re: Stolen designs
- Previous by thread: Re: Stolen designs
- Next by thread: Re: Stolen designs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|