Re: Are MilliHenries obselete?
- From: "Roger Hamlett" <rogerspamignored@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:05:27 GMT
"Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bgh392duv6lc2f12shmfhbk8a9khm3mk28@xxxxxxxxxx
On 15 Jun 2006 13:06:26 -0700, the renowned "Tom Bruhns"I suspect that these have become very 'low volume' items. A gyrator can be
<k7itm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
martin griffith wrote:
Just been trying to find some *inexpensive* 8.2mH inductors for a
20K-ish bandpass chebyshev filter, Digikey(UK), Farnell, RS
components, nothing that I could find.
done with an op-amp, or one transistor, and in terms of production costs,
is so much cheaper, and can actually often perform better, leading to the
inductor, tending to die.
I'd suspect it'd be easier to use the gyrator for this, than wait for the
inductor...
Best Wishes
.
- References:
- Are MilliHenries obselete?
- From: martin griffith
- Re: Are MilliHenries obselete?
- From: Tom Bruhns
- Re: Are MilliHenries obselete?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Are MilliHenries obselete?
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA: "Damn the tin whiskers, launch the shuttle"
- Next by Date: Re: Sub-Carrier Multiplexing
- Previous by thread: Re: Are MilliHenries obselete?
- Next by thread: Re: Are MilliHenries obselete?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|