Re: Differential probes
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2006 05:08:46 GMT
John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ioge92lem7883ifqr24k90tet34se42dqp@xxxxxxx:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:49:57 -0700, Chris Carlen
<crcarleRemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi:
I have a Tek P5205 1:50/1:500 100MHz probe. I just tested it with a
1MHz square wave and it gives nice clean edges with little ringing.
However, a Fluke DP120 20MHz 1:20/1:200 probe loaned to me by an Agilent
sales rep. gives miserably ringing edges. The Fluke is kind of silly in
having 4 ft. long heavy cables with huge probes that look suitable for
heavy duty power distribution probing. Not very convenient for little
stuff.
But worse, the Fluke gives horribly ringing edges. I tried making the
test cables into a twist-pair, which helped a little but not much. Do
the designers ever really think that the thing can give meaningful
measurements of 20MHz signals with such a huge pickup loop area! Also,
the FP120 is about 4x more noisy than the Tek. The Fluke must have a
power supply in there to generate a negative supply, whereas the Tek
just pulls clean power from the scope.
Ugh!
The problem with the Tek is it can only work with the scope. But I need
to look at a filtered signal to get better RMS measurements of PWM BLDC
motor terminal voltages.
Although the FLuke gave a little better 1MHz CMRR of about -66dB vs. Tek
-49dB.
There are also a bunch of probes on the market that look like this:
http://www.probemaster.com/activedifferential.html
http://www.linkinstruments.com/adf25.htm
I wonder how they perform?
Oh well, just deliberating in public.
Thanks for input.
We just got a new Tek TPS2024 scope. It's a 4-channel, 200 MHz color
scope and all four channels plus the trigger inputs are isolated. So
you can use regular 1:1 or 10:1 probes for off-ground measurements at
millivolt sensitivity. Slick.
The 50:1 attenuation of the P5205 turns low-level stuff to mush.
John
It won't have the CMRR of a true diff amp.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Differential probes
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Differential probes
- References:
- Differential probes
- From: Chris Carlen
- Re: Differential probes
- From: John Larkin
- Differential probes
- Prev by Date: Re: Differential probes
- Next by Date: Re: Differential probes
- Previous by thread: Re: Differential probes
- Next by thread: Re: Differential probes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|