Re: Differential probes
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2006 15:53:10 GMT
John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ik4g92593d3b6dl790nfp06opc0i1d0h90@xxxxxxx:
On 20 Jun 2006 05:08:46 GMT, Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ioge92lem7883ifqr24k90tet34se42dqp@xxxxxxx:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:49:57 -0700, Chris Carlen
<crcarleRemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi:
I have a Tek P5205 1:50/1:500 100MHz probe. I just tested it with a
1MHz square wave and it gives nice clean edges with little ringing.
However, a Fluke DP120 20MHz 1:20/1:200 probe loaned to me by an
Agilent sales rep. gives miserably ringing edges. The Fluke is kind
of silly in having 4 ft. long heavy cables with huge probes that
look suitable for heavy duty power distribution probing. Not very
convenient for little stuff.
But worse, the Fluke gives horribly ringing edges. I tried making
the test cables into a twist-pair, which helped a little but not
much. Do the designers ever really think that the thing can give
meaningful measurements of 20MHz signals with such a huge pickup
loop area! Also, the FP120 is about 4x more noisy than the Tek.
The Fluke must have a power supply in there to generate a negative
supply, whereas the Tek just pulls clean power from the scope.
Ugh!
The problem with the Tek is it can only work with the scope. But I
need to look at a filtered signal to get better RMS measurements of
PWM BLDC motor terminal voltages.
Although the FLuke gave a little better 1MHz CMRR of about -66dB vs.
Tek -49dB.
There are also a bunch of probes on the market that look like this:
http://www.probemaster.com/activedifferential.html
http://www.linkinstruments.com/adf25.htm
I wonder how they perform?
Oh well, just deliberating in public.
Thanks for input.
We just got a new Tek TPS2024 scope. It's a 4-channel, 200 MHz color
scope and all four channels plus the trigger inputs are isolated. So
you can use regular 1:1 or 10:1 probes for off-ground measurements
at millivolt sensitivity. Slick.
The 50:1 attenuation of the P5205 turns low-level stuff to mush.
John
It won't have the CMRR of a true diff amp.
The TPS2024 is truly isolated to 600 volts RMS
So what? That has nothing to do with differential amp performance.
All that means is the front ends are isolated from the case to 600 V.
The 7A13 has a wide input overdrive capability,has matched attentuators
carefully calibrated for low CMRR,and a true low CMRR differential
amplifier.
AFAIK,NONE of the TDS series were designed to have true differential
capability,just the simple "invert&add Ch2" sort like the older analog
scopes.
and goes down to 2
mv/cm, which is pretty extreme. It would be nice if it had the 10
uv/cm sensitivity and switchable bw of a 1A7A/7A22.
Many of the TDS series have an adjustable BW-limit feature.
Maybe I'll make a little battery-powered preamp box to front-end the
2024 and get down to microvolt levels; switchable bandwidth would be
handy, too. It could be single-ended, since the scope provides the
isolation.
It still would make a lousy differential amp.
Does anybody make male BNC connectors with plastic (insulated)
connector shells?
John
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Differential probes
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Differential probes
- References:
- Differential probes
- From: Chris Carlen
- Re: Differential probes
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Differential probes
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: Differential probes
- From: John Larkin
- Differential probes
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiplying Frequency
- Next by Date: Re: Calibrating Volt Meters
- Previous by thread: Re: Differential probes
- Next by thread: Re: Differential probes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|