Re: Switch question
- From: Keith <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:29:26 -0400
In article <rddd929f2s5l37cnt3b962eg45bf39kno9@xxxxxxx>, To-Email-
Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:20:22 -0400, krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <KBjlg.62017$qd2.24611@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,[snip]
look@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
(And those who use the word "fifties" to denote approximately 1925-75. The
"fifties" do not comprise the Nixon or Hoover presidencies, nor WWII, nor
the Beatles...)
Nixon was in office in the '50s ('53-'61), BTW. Hoovers sucked
then too.
Eh?
'53-'61 would be about right for Nixon as Eisenhower's VP, but he was
President from 1969-1974. See...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/rn37.html
I didn't say Nixon was President, only "in office"; one heartbeat
away. ;-)
--
Keith
.
- References:
- Switch question
- From: none none
- Re: Switch question
- From: mc
- Re: Switch question
- From: none none
- Re: Switch question
- From: John B
- Re: Switch question
- From: mc
- Re: Switch question
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Switch question
- From: mc
- Re: Switch question
- From: krw
- Re: Switch question
- From: Jim Thompson
- Switch question
- Prev by Date: Cook's Institute of Electrical Engineering
- Next by Date: Re: Why do CPUs run hotter...?
- Previous by thread: Re: Switch question
- Next by thread: Re: Switch question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|