Re: what the hell is ROHS
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:23:55 -0400
In article <449C8AAE.29CA2523@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Ian Bell wrote:
Brian wrote:
Hell, in China, they'd be greener if they reduced the population
by about 500 million or so.....
IMHO the USA could benefit from the same.
Ian
Or we could just nuke all of Europe, instead. Then there would be
no more Euroweenies, and anti-American whining from the likes of you.
IOW, a few dozen multi nuclear warhead missiles, and no more problems.
You'd get nuked back of course. A compelling reason for the UK to keep its
independent deterrent.
Nah, all we'd have to do is convince France we were launching.
They'd launch and shoot themselves, again.
--
Keith
.
- References:
- what the hell is ROHS
- From: The Real Andy
- Re: what the hell is ROHS
- From: Rene Tschaggelar
- Re: what the hell is ROHS
- From: Brian
- Re: what the hell is ROHS
- From: Ian Bell
- Re: what the hell is ROHS
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: what the hell is ROHS
- From: Eeyore
- what the hell is ROHS
- Prev by Date: Re: Cascade two voltage regs
- Next by Date: Re: what the hell is ROHS
- Previous by thread: Re: what the hell is ROHS
- Next by thread: Re: what the hell is ROHS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading