Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- From: Terry Pinnell <terrypinDELETE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:42:10 +0100
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 00:11:22 GMT, "Tom Del Rosso"
<td_01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"bruce varley" <bxvarley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:449d62a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Terry, Spehro's right on the money in terms of a solution. Put simply, it
looks like your problem is the fact that with the 10u cap on the input if
the gate, the input voltage can only change slowly, so the gate spends
significant time in the noise-prone region, and what you're seeing is
noise-induced switching during that time. Hysteresis works by being fast.
Shouldn't the feedback resistance also be much lower to speed-up switching?
Even if he changes the PI to a T like Spehro said, 10Mohms times the input
capacitance alone would produce a long switching interval like that
observed.
Use...
http://analog-innovations.com/SED/CMOS-Osc-NoClip.pdf
Eliminate U4A and R5. Change R4 to a short. Input via R1.
Then you get both noise integration, yet snap at the threshold.
...Jim Thompson
Thanks Jim. I'll try adapting that circuit and maybe use it next time.
Present circuit is already built on stripboard, with several other
sections, so want to fix it with existing 4001/4011/4013.
--
Terry Pinnell
Hobbyist, West Sussex, UK
.
- References:
- 4001 as Schmitt
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- From: Terry Pinnell
- Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- From: bruce varley
- Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- From: Tom Del Rosso
- Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- From: Jim Thompson
- 4001 as Schmitt
- Prev by Date: Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- Next by Date: Re: Audiophools
- Previous by thread: Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- Next by thread: Re: 4001 as Schmitt
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|