Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:32:40 -0400
In article <g7dr9255dffu0fbmtsa1rk15l1blbtqd99@xxxxxxx>,
jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On 24 Jun 2006 14:51:56 -0700, cbarn24050@xxxxxxx wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On 23 Jun 2006 16:15:11 -0700, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Perfect application for two 555's actually, the first one running as
the astable and the second one being triggered by the falling edge
of the first one.
--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer
Who needs a 555 when you've got a PIC.
---
*** you, you elitist little cocksucker.
Now, now, Jim.
Who needs a PIC when you don't know the instruction set, you don't
have an assembler or a compiler or a programmer, and you've got to
get something running in an hour or so and you've got a couple of
555's and enough different R's and C's laying around to work out the
time constants you need for a one-off?
But sometimes you feel like a PlIC and sometimes you don't.
You figure it out, Sherlock.
If you can.
Gees, lighten up!
--
Keith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: John Fields
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- References:
- Adding delay to the pulse
- From: prateek
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: cbarn24050
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: John Fields
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: cbarn24050
- Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- From: John Fields
- Adding delay to the pulse
- Prev by Date: Re: what the hell is ROHS
- Next by Date: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- Next by thread: Re: Adding delay to the pulse
- Index(es):