Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Fred Bloggs <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:26:33 GMT
PeteS wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:
PeteS wrote:
Duh - that should be ISO 7637 (low caffeine typo)
Cheers
PeteS
S'okay- nobody reads your pedestrian limey sh_t anyway...
how amusing - A Sunday driveby insult, and not that good either :)
"how amusing"- aren't you the suave and sophisticated *pimp*- not real impressed with your very *British* petty posing and arrogance- GFOAD.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Luhan
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- References:
- one supply = two supplies
- From: Big House
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- one supply = two supplies
- Prev by Date: Re: Tank Depth
- Next by Date: Re: Flag desecration?
- Previous by thread: Re: one supply = two supplies
- Next by thread: Re: one supply = two supplies
- Index(es):