Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: "PeteS" <PeterSmith1954@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jul 2006 14:07:28 -0700
Fred Bloggs wrote:
PeteS wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:
PeteS wrote:
Duh - that should be ISO 7637 (low caffeine typo)
Cheers
PeteS
S'okay- nobody reads your pedestrian limey sh_t anyway...
how amusing - A Sunday driveby insult, and not that good either :)
"how amusing"- aren't you the suave and sophisticated *pimp*- not real
impressed with your very *British* petty posing and arrogance- GFOAD.
In which case my answer had the desired response. Bad hair day? Or are
you giving up caffeine cold turkey? (A friend of mine once gave up
smoking wild turkey - told me it was the only way).
Cheers
PeteS
PS. Have a nice day, as they say all over the states.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- References:
- one supply = two supplies
- From: Big House
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: PeteS
- Re: one supply = two supplies
- From: Fred Bloggs
- one supply = two supplies
- Prev by Date: Re: one supply = two supplies
- Next by Date: Re: one supply = two supplies
- Previous by thread: Re: one supply = two supplies
- Next by thread: Re: one supply = two supplies
- Index(es):