Re: RF design Mag article


Michael A. Terrell wrote:
dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Mike Monett wrote:
dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

March 1989, Pacholok, "A Microwave Oven to Amateur TV Transmitter
Conversion," pp48-55.

I've got a photocopy I could scan -- what format, and where do you
want it?

Best,
James Arthur

Dunno. I scanned it @ 600 DPI, in Wang-viewer compatible
LZW-compressed .TIFF (the viewer, Start->Accessories->Imaging, comes
standard with Win98). It's kind of large -- isn't 3.5MB a little
inconsiderate, even on a.b.s.e.?

I could certainly e-mail it to anyone interested, and am open to
posting ideas.

Best,
James


Send it to me and I'll put it on one of my websites for a few weeks
for you. (Or longer, until I need the space.)

Thanks Michael, that's a very generous offer.

After reviewing the options, I think I prefer to e-mail the file to
those interested. That way I won't crowd other traffic off the
a.b.s.e. servers, and I can respect the copyright-owner's rights too.
(e-mailing a few copies to interested parties is certainly "fair use,"
and allowed under copyright law. The effect of posting the thing,
however, isn't as clear to me. I prefer to err on the conservative
side.)

The file's 3.5MB, which uuencodes to a 5MB e-mail attachment. It's
viewable with the standard WinXP "Windows Picture and Fax Viewer," or
the "Imaging" accessory that comes standard with Win98.

Thanks again for the offer, and best regards,
James Arthur

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RF design Mag article - Oops!
    ... James Arthur ... standard with Win98). ... I would very much appreciate a 600 dpi copy of that article. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: RF design Mag article
    ... James Arthur ... standard with Win98). ... inconsiderate, even on a.b.s.e.? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Top posting
    ... INFORMATIONAL RFC does NOT make it STANDARD. ... Go look up RFC 2026 for what it takes to become a standard. ... to get to the bottom line which adds "This is how I feel about it too." ... And top posting or bottom posting just including all that text is a ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: (was) Toyota, GM, and Ford differences
    ... REQUEST FOR COMMENT is the same thing as a standard? ... when I read that top posting evolved from a Microsoft ... It has it's origins in the BBSs of yore. ... "ignoring" standards (relating to top vs. bottom posting). ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
  • Re: CLASS Terminology
    ... Item 5 above is a bit inconsistent in that it does not ... You appear to be confusing the Fortran 2003 standard with the Fortran ... This is the authors of the Handbook commenting on something that they ... It is perhaps more simillar to your own posting. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)