Re: New Book of Rules
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:53:41 -0400
In article <4jf5puF7q56kU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx
says...
John Woodgate wrote:
In message <4jevt0F7ncu4U2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Dirk
Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx> writes
So one has to be incited to oppose a foreign occupying army...
Well, if that army would be inactive, and in due course would go away
entirely, if it wasn't attacked, a civilian's best interest is not to
attack it. So that civilian needs to be incited to lose his reason and
attack.
ie if the civilian population lies down and accepts its puppet govt
foisted upon it by the occupying army, then that army will leave.
Sound a bit 'Soviet Bloc' doesn't it?
No, it sounds like Lebanon.
--
Keith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Phat Bytestard
- Re: New Book of Rules
- References:
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: John Fields
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
- Re: New Book of Rules
- Prev by Date: Re: Imagine: 500 Miles Per Gallon
- Next by Date: Re: Pulse transformers and RS232 (2nd try)
- Previous by thread: Re: New Book of Rules
- Next by thread: Re: New Book of Rules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|