Re: New Book of Rules

Eeyore wrote:

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:33:35 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
<dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:26:32 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
<dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John Fields wrote:
---
Between periods of malevolent behavior, a rabid dog remains a rabid
dog.
Then George should not have owned the rabid dog in the first place,
should he?
---
Why not? Lots of people have sick pets which they hope will get
better but which eventually _have_ to be put down.
But George liked him *because* he was sick.
George didn't want him to get better.
---
LOL, you were there, huh?
I was around, and complaining about Saddam being a tyrannical murderer,
when he was your good pal and Rummy was photographed shaking his hand.

Do you recall that Iraqi Guardian ? journalist who got strung up by the neck
with wire by Saddam for venturing too close to some dodgy military installation
when on a story ?

Must have been during the 80s I reckon.

Interesting how hating Saddam made one a weak wimpy leftist back then, and hating him now makes one a strong rightwing patriot.

Dirk
.