Re: New Book of Rules
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 01:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
In article <bv0fd2545o3i1h2ra9v610fi1juvrci3f1@xxxxxxx>,
Phat Bytestard <phatbytestard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:42:37 +0000 (UTC), kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken
Smith) Gave us:
It claims to support your position so you call it correct but can you
find any proof? Those who wish to increase military spending make lots of
claims about it beyond "it is needed" but when the facts are checked, the
only reason to spend on the military is because it is needed.
You wouldn't even be sitting in front of a personal computer right
now were it not for the military and their endeavors.
Nonsense!
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Phat Bytestard
- Re: New Book of Rules
- Prev by Date: Re: New Book of Rules
- Next by Date: Re: The French are at it again
- Previous by thread: Re: New Book of Rules
- Next by thread: Re: New Book of Rules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
