Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:46:33 +0100
krw wrote:
In article <4jvfi3F9tmn1U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx
says...
John Larkin wrote:
and the U.K. is almost as old-fashioned, though
at least they have some fairly effective rules for stopping excessive
election advertising.
Some very bright and thoughtful people have argued that there is no
such thing as excessive election advertising. Our Supreme Court has
found that restricting election advertising is in violation of our
constitutional right to free speech.
Hardly 'free' is it?
Not as in "beer", no. There _are_ more important things than "free
beer".
Where's this free beer you mention ?
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Keith
- Re: New Book of Rules
- References:
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: John Larkin
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: John Larkin
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
- Re: New Book of Rules
- From: krw
- Re: New Book of Rules
- Prev by Date: Re: New Book of Rules
- Next by Date: Re: Vegetable Semiconductors
- Previous by thread: Re: New Book of Rules
- Next by thread: Re: New Book of Rules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|