Re: Liquid explosives
- From: martin griffith <mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:24:34 +0200
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:36:28 +0100, in sci.electronics.design "Reg
Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The recent, well publicised scare about liquid bombs on airliners willI've always liked KMnO4 and steel wool.
certainly have the effect of removing people's minds from Bush's and
Blair's Middle Eastern policy.
Public opinion has been getting out of control lately.
=========================================
But I can't see the point of having a remotely detonated device, I
thought a pressure sensor was a good way to trigger a bomb. Having a
person in the loop, more chance of errors.
It all seems a bit suspect to me
martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Luhan
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Reg Edwards
- Re: Liquid explosives
- References:
- Liquid explosives
- From: Reg Edwards
- Liquid explosives
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for engineer to build a couple of small projects
- Next by Date: Re: crap circuit boards
- Previous by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Next by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
