Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:01:18 +0100
krw wrote:
In article <Xns981BA2F658CA8jyanikkuanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jyanik@xxxxxxxxx says...
John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:C$92TnmU812EFwIJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
In message <44DB2A7F.8FEEFE18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated Thu, 10 Aug
2006, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Oh - it's supposed to be *liquids* is it ? I couldn't understand why
they'd confiscate bottles of *water* or pop.
I couldn't imagine a long-haul flight without at least 2 if not 4
litres of water with me. Helps prevent DVT never mind just making you
feel better by not getting dehydrated.
I expect the aircraft carry extra water etc., to prevent passenger
distress.
Free,or at airline prices?
I used to bring a couple of cans of Coke in my briefcase along with
snacks,because some flight attendants were stingy with the soda and
snacks.Now,I hear that they may not supply them at all.
I suppose they could ask you to drink a fair sample of your "water" or
soda.
There was a report this morning that said they thought the
explosives were going to be put in false bottoms or capsules inside
larger containers so the terrorists could drink from them.
Still no reason to ban water which is typically in clear plastic 'bottles'.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Mike
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: martin griffith
- Re: Liquid explosives
- References:
- Liquid explosives
- From: Reg Edwards
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: krw
- Liquid explosives
- Prev by Date: Re: Digital Frequency Comparator
- Next by Date: Re: Digital Frequency Comparator
- Previous by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Next by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Index(es):