555; was: Re: Who is your favourite electronics guru?

<bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155421641.296694.20070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Not exactly. The absence of any modern competitior for the 555's slot
has more to say about the absence of any serious application for the
555 in mass-produced devices than it has to say about the quality of
the original design.

Interesting thought. I use 555s a lot developing one-of-a-kind prototypes.
But I'm inclined to agree that in a more complex, more systematically
designed system, there probably aren't going to be many 555-shaped holes, so
to speak. Switching and timing are done by the CPU if there is one.
Oscillators can be cobbled together out of leftover gates. And so on.

In one of my current projects I am deliberating between a 555 and an 8-pin
microcontroller. Given that we save a couple of diodes and capacitors, the
micro may be cheaper! And it opens up the possibility of adding other
intelligent behavior, response to additional sensors, soft start-up, status
indicators, etc., all by just writing more code.

The appeal of the 555 is that I can give a hobbyist a circuit that can be
built with Radio Shack parts, with no device programming.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 555; was: Re: Who is your favourite electronics guru?
    ... has more to say about the absence of any serious application for the ... the original design. ... designed system, there probably aren't going to be many 555-shaped holes, so ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: 555; was: Re: Who is your favourite electronics guru?
    ... 555 in mass-produced devices than it has to say about the quality of ... the original design. ... designed system, there probably aren't going to be many 555-shaped holes, so ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: 555; was: Re: Who is your favourite electronics guru?
    ... has more to say about the absence of any serious application for the ... 555 in mass-produced devices than it has to say about the quality of ... But I'm inclined to agree that in a more complex, more systematically designed system, there probably aren't going to be many 555-shaped holes, so to speak. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Loading