Re: Liquid explosives
- From: martin griffith <mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:18:14 +0200
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:11:37 +0000 (UTC), in sci.electronics.design
mjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mike) wrote:
In article <508vd2lr7qk3js581c1l70g7ppr6d0r224@xxxxxxx>,a bit like this, you mean?
Barry Lennox <bt.l.barryl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, I'm sure it's even easier to ban everything, except for a
passport and tickets. Get all passengers to report 8 hours in
advance,for a full check and interrogation, then they must change
into sterile airline-provided jumpsuits, pack and send ALL clothes,
etc on by freight-only aircraft. Then reassemble everything at the
other end. There will be a cost to all this, but that can be solved by
a simple ticket tax.
If the above was implemented, I'm sure you'd still find someone who said
"Yes, but it's for security, so we must put up with it!" :)
The passenger numbers may drop just a tiny amount, but hey, the
airlines don't really like them much anyway.
And anyway, only a couple of weeks ago, there was a big fuss about the
numbers of people flying, and how we need a way to reduce numbers of
airline flights, to protect the environment. Hmmm. Nice timing ...
http://www.wondermark.com/d/220.html
martin
.
- References:
- Liquid explosives
- From: Reg Edwards
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Mike
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Barry Lennox
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Mike
- Liquid explosives
- Prev by Date: Re: Liquid explosives
- Next by Date: Re: EMP blast - what would happen really?
- Previous by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Next by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|