Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:43:48 +0100
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:46:25 -0700, Richard Henry wrote:
krw wrote:
In article <rllcV5Yxyw3EFwU+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
says...
'Neoconservative' appears to be your term. What's the difference
between a neoconservative and a palaeoconservative (apart from age, of
course)?
"Neoconservative" is a code word for "Jew", or closer "damned JOO".
And I thought I knew Keith. This outburst is a surprise.
Anyway, addressing the content. It seems to me that the intersection of
"neoconservative" and "damed JOO" is the null set. Your experience may be
different.
I believe the Israelites have something akin to The Stockholm Syndrome -
they've taken on the characteristics (and behaviour) of their former
abusers.
Scarily so in fact.
Graham
.
- References:
- Liquid explosives
- From: Reg Edwards
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Barry Lennox
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: mc
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: xray
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: krw
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Liquid explosives
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Liquid explosives
- Prev by Date: Re: EMP blast - what would happen really?
- Next by Date: Re: Liquid explosives
- Previous by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Next by thread: Re: Liquid explosives
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|