Re: New Book of Rules

Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ecd7e2dsmn3utfi02n0a8uth92sgs6fap2@xxxxxxx:
On 16 Aug 2006 23:43:50 GMT, Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[whatever]
Spoken like a genuine Liberal! Thank you for this classic line; I just
love this sort of reasoning.

One more datum showing that liberals are anti-free speech.

That's a paradox: one of the definitions of "liberal" is "tolerant",

Not in the current usage WRT politics.
These days,"liberal" is more accurately "socialist".

Not just 'socialist': 'liberal' in US politics now seems to mean
'authoritarian socialist'. That's a fair attempt at the exact opposite
meaning of liberal, as far as I can tell.


Tim
.