Re: Bluetooth chips question
- From: "vasile" <piclist9@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Sep 2006 04:05:35 -0700
John Woodgate wrote:
In message <44ff2f0c.1150679790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated Wed, 6 Sep
2006, Nico Coesel <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I didn't notice that. Yes, 'analyser' is usually used in British
In message <1157558916.795001.98000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dated
Wed, 6 Sep 2006, vasile <piclist9@xxxxxxxxx> writes
network analizer
Please note that it's 'analyser'. The spelling you use indicates that
the network is fundamentally inserted.
Is there some rule about the 's' and 'z'?
English, and 'analyzer' in US English. There are no rules; it's all down
to usage.
But in general, 'z' is correct, except for a few words, such as
'comprise', 'surprise' and 'advertise'. Apart from those, the 's'
spelling was invented in Britain by some newspaper editors in the 1920s
and isn't etymologically correct.
I normally use 'z', because it's used in IEC standards.
I used "analizer" because that is called in romanian language,
english is just a language I've learned at school, 25 years ago.
Of course it looks in english "analyser" is the most frequently used.
greetings,
Vasile
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bluetooth chips question
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Bluetooth chips question
- References:
- Bluetooth chips question
- From: Je-Rock
- Re: Bluetooth chips question
- From: vasile
- Re: Bluetooth chips question
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: Bluetooth chips question
- From: Nico Coesel
- Re: Bluetooth chips question
- From: John Woodgate
- Bluetooth chips question
- Prev by Date: Re: Impulse Response, Fourier and Laplace Transforms, and Parseval's Relation
- Next by Date: Re: abuse@bellsouth.net
- Previous by thread: Re: Bluetooth chips question
- Next by thread: Re: Bluetooth chips question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|