Re: The HP Way
- From: John Woodgate <jmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:08:48 +0100
In message <u6vag21n6ndkh61ijhbqm5ieqqcm958lgt@xxxxxxx>, dated Mon, 11 Sep 2006, John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
How can you know, even using your definition of "mutation", that mutations are always random?
There is no evidence that they are anything other. Occam's Razor. But if the proteome is shown to be able to cause changes in the DNA of germ cells, thus providing a path for 'inheritance of acquired characteristics', so be it. That doesn't change anything much; it's certainly not radical.
It certainly doesn't make sense that they should be.
Things don't have to make sense, and what makes sense varies with the person sensing. For most people, quantum entanglement doesn't make sense, but for some, it does. It makes perfect sense that radiation, chemicals and copying errors can create random changes in DNA.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The HP Way
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The HP Way
- References:
- The HP Way
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The HP Way
- From: dagmargoodboat
- Re: The HP Way
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: The HP Way
- From: dagmargoodboat
- Re: The HP Way
- From: John Woodgate
- Re: The HP Way
- From: dagmargoodboat
- Re: The HP Way
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The HP Way
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: The HP Way
- From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen
- Re: The HP Way
- From: David Brown
- Re: The HP Way
- From: John Larkin
- The HP Way
- Prev by Date: Re: The HP Way
- Next by Date: Re: Gamma Values for LCD modules
- Previous by thread: Re: The HP Way
- Next by thread: Re: The HP Way
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|