Re: OT: "Global Warming" vs. "Science"
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:19:05 GMT
gfretwell@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 23:26:41 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh, heavens! I'm not by any means implying that Mr. Twain was anti-science -
my reading of his quip, admittedly a bit between the lines, is that he
has contempt for those who would take a certain known fact and extrapolate
it to such extremes that they could use "science" to make a point, much
like the global warmingists are doing, and the ozonists did a few years
ago, and so on. :-)
Cheers!
Rich
"Environmentalism" has eroded from what we used to call conservation
to a cult religion, complete with sin and redemption through
sacrifice. SUVs have simply replaced the "virgin".
If you don't like the weather throw another SUV into the volcano.
I'd prefer to use lawyers or politicians. They have a lower resale
value.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
.
- References:
- OT: "Global Warming" vs. "Science"
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: OT: "Global Warming" vs. "Science"
- From: mgkelson
- Re: OT: "Global Warming" vs. "Science"
- From: Rich Grise
- OT: "Global Warming" vs. "Science"
- Prev by Date: Re: CMOS analogues switch capacitance
- Next by Date: Re: CMOS analogues switch capacitance
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: "Global Warming" vs. "Science"
- Next by thread: PixelsWall Free Magazine (amazing one!!)
- Index(es):