Re: Jihad needs scientists
- From: "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@xxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2006 12:24:33 GMT
Eeyore wrote:
lucasea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<jmfbahciv@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
jmfbahciv@xxxxxxx wrote:
do >>> you not understand?What part of changing a mindset to Western economy and politics
What part of " changing a mindset to Western economy and
politics " do you not realise can't be imposed by external
force ?
First you remove the elements that prevent this from happening
and then you let the locals figure out how to organize and
implement it and stay out of their way.
Yeah, and how's that one working out?
I watched a couple of episodes of Star Trek just now. It's been a
while since it was last on BBC.
It's amusing to see some of those modern 'morality tales' once again.
It seems to me that the Bush administration ( and others ) could
learn something from the famous Prime Directive - i.e don't interfer
in the affairs of other cultures because of the risk of disaster if
you do no matter how well meaning your interference may have been.
Graham
Yes, that's good. And it would not interfer with the self-acclaimed
super-state, where all is so peaceful and happy and, of course, their
super high evolved high-tech Art Tech they have.
But what they do actually (Irak), is the same for me, as Captain Kirk
(Star Trek) would dig for dilizium (Trekkie fuel :-)), on a world with
inhabitants, which have no clue about starships...
(Someone knows an iraqi brand Car?? Airplane? Ship?)
Best regards,
Daniel Mandic
.
- Prev by Date: Re: O.T. Was this "engineered" this way?
- Next by Date: Re: Jihad needs scientists
- Previous by thread: Re: Jihad needs scientists
- Next by thread: Re: Jihad needs scientists
- Index(es):