Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 21:23:21 -0800
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 04:53:53 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
PeteS <peter.smith8380@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Homer J Simpson wrote:Really makes it rather amusing - Clinton was dragged over the coals for
Haggard, a married father of five, said he never had sex with Mike Jones
I *did not* have sex with that..... man !
LMAO.
Graham
getting a blow job, but at least it was from a gal ;)
No, it was for sexual harassement and perjury.
What really are *sexual relations* ?
According to the bible I think only penetrative sex counts and Clinton had
indeed not done that.
Sexual harassment is illegal here. Bill and Hill were ironically
champions of anti-sexual-harassment laws. And I think perjury may
still be illegal in the Olde World, too.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: joseph2k
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- References:
- Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: PeteS
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- From: Eeyore
- Another fine Republican Evangelist
- Prev by Date: Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- Next by Date: Re: Sell Short?
- Previous by thread: Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- Next by thread: Re: Another fine Republican Evangelist
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|