Re: The Larkin front end
- From: Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:12:47 GMT
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:34:30 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:55:59 +0000, Eeyore
SioL wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Consider the inherent rejection of common mode signals in a differential front end. It
doesn't work so well if the signals are different sizes ( rather obviously ).
I'll use 1% caps here too.
Graham
I think I understand John.
If the first stage is a balanced opamp input, its a biq question how "balanced" its function
is as a rf detector, the interference signals are likely way out of the operational range
of that opamp. Thermocouple sounds like a very slow device. Pretty much killing
anything even remotely RF should work pretty well.
A ferrite bead won't do that.
The only complication being that it does.
It sounds to me like we're comparing lossy low-pass filters to common-mode
chokes here. Isn't that kind of like apples and tomatoes?
Thanks,
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Larkin front end
- References:
- The Larkin front end
- From: martin griffith
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: mark
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: SioL
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Larkin front end
- From: John Larkin
- The Larkin front end
- Prev by Date: Re: Voltage rating of LM317
- Next by Date: Re: Anyone here know how an one-armed bandit (slot machine) works?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Larkin front end
- Next by thread: Re: The Larkin front end
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|