Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 11 Nov 2006 10:12:16 -0800
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:42:24 -0600, John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:00:41 +0000, Eeyore
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:38:54 +0000, Eeyore
<snip>
You've been reading too much right-wing propaganda aka Americannewspapers. Most trade unions have more sense than to price their
labour at a level that would bankrupt their employers, and send the
jobs to some third world country.
E.g. the American autoworkers' unions? The airlines? Or did you
mean Bethlehem Steel? Longshoremen perhaps?
No Bill, unions are dying here for exactly the reason you say they
won't--they've priced themselves so high, the economic incentive to
replace them is irresistable. And that's what's been happening.*
This usually means that management has decided that it wants to move
production off-shore, and chosen to hollow-out the domestic production
by failing to invest in new equipment (so that productivity falls)
while dealing with any pressure from the workers by closing plants
because the workers aren't producing enough to cover their wages.
<snip>
It's tempting to explain the absurdity of that contention, but
instead I'll just note that my brother made $16/hr in 1977 as a member
of the grocery clerk's union, for stocking the shelves with goods.
After he finished his masters' degree in business administration he
moved on to appropriate employment, but, of course, he had to take a
pay cut.
On his job it was the union that insisted on keeping productivity
low--lots of "shop rules" requiring that, for example, three guys would
be present and paid to unload a truck, even though not even two were
needed.
The old, established grocery companies here are foundering, barely
profitable, and not able to compete--I can buy better food for about
half their prices. So they're trying to cut costs, trying to adapt.
In response, that same union held a strike a couple years ago,
resisting a small co-pay proposed for their health plan. They lost.
Best wishes,
James Arthur
.
- References:
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Glenn Gundlach
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: John Fields
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: dagmargoodboat
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Watching the election results ?
- Prev by Date: The world's most expensive mobile phone
- Next by Date: Re: the IDpal labeler..Comments needed./
- Previous by thread: Re: Watching the election results ?
- Next by thread: Re: Watching the election results ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|